--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <sparaig@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" > <shempmcgurk@> > <snip> > > > > No, the oldest trick in the book is to let you THINK that the > > > > powers that be let the kooks run wild and to let you THINK that > > > > the real evidence is being obscured by the fuss they stir up. > > > > > > Um, no, Shemp, there'd be no motivation for them to > > > do that if they were "clean." > > > > There's "clean" and then there's "clean." > > > > I can easily make the case that the Bush Administration LIKES the > > confusion, not because they have anything concrete to hide, but > > because as long as people are muttering about "conspiracies" > > they're not bitching nearly as much about gross incompetence. > > I kind of don't think that could be it, simply because > the conspiracy theorists are in a really tiny minority. > Keeping *them* distracted from the gross incompetence > isn't going to be that much of a help. > > But because they're so highly motivated to find the dirt, > distracting them from real dirt could be a *huge* help; > they're likely to be the ones who find it, if there is > any. > > And I think there is *some*. The most glaring evidence > that something funny was going on is what happened on > the stock market in the days before the attack.
Okay, Genius, here are the closing figures for the Dow Jones Industrial Average for each trading day in September 2001 before 9/11/2001. Please: show us the "glaring evidence", as you put it, that something funny was going on. 10-Sep-01 9,605.51 7-Sep-01 9,605.85 6-Sep-01 9,840.84 5-Sep-01 10,033.27 4-Sep-01 9,997.49 31-Aug-01 9,949.75 > I > haven't seen anybody even attempt to make a case that > that was benign. > > On the other hand, it's usually just mentioned in passing > as one of the "unanswered questions." I'm unaware of > anyone who is seriously trying to dig up information on > it. > > Seems to me it would be the key to the whole thing. Yet > people are much more fascinated by the controlled- > demolition and "Where's the plane?" scenarios, which just > aren't going to get anywhere definitive (unless somebody > 'fesses up). > To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
