--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], anony_sleuth_ff <no_reply@> 
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> 
wrote:
> > >
> > > 
> > > And I think there is *some*.  The most glaring evidence
> > > that something funny was going on is what happened on
> > > the stock market in the days before the attack.  I
> > > haven't seen anybody even attempt to make a case that
> > > that was benign.
> > 
> > From the Loose  Change video, their argument was that trading in
> > Boeing options volume was 2x,3x and 5x or something some days or
> > weeks prior to 9/11. In itself, that means nothing. Stock or 
option 
> > volume can vary widely -- on any number of factors -- including 
> > quite mundane and benign ones. Look to the Force Luke (and 
Judy) -- 
> > aka the statistics 101 class you took years ago. 
> > 
> > How many standard deviations from the mean was the event(s)? The 
> > above numbers could have been 1 SD -- quite frequent, or a six-
> > sigma event --- very, very rare. Present the statistics (Yahoo 
> > Finance may have), then make a case. 
> > 
> > For fun I might look up the data and see. I bet it was an event
> > happening once every 3-12 months, or 1-4 times a year or more. 
> > 
> > And why focus only on Boeing? If the market as a whole dumped 
after
> > 9/11 (after market reopenened in 3-4 days, as I recall. Why not 
just
> > short the S&P 500 or buy puts options on the S&P 500. That would 
be
> > much harder to see and trace anomolies due to volume.
> 
> Read this and get back to me, OK?
> 
> http://tinyurl.com/bmjgg
> 
> Didn't have anything to do with Boeing.  It *did*
> have to do with put options, nearly 100 times greater
> than normal on American Airlines, for example.
>


THIS is what you are so excited about, Judy (here's the first 
paragraph of the article, which pretty much sums it up):

"Manipulators with inside information made huge profits on 
sophisticated trades as the stocks of the airline and insurance 
companies plummeted in the aftermath of the Sept. 11 disaster. The 
inside information was so precise that experts have concluded that 
it could have only come from those who masterminded the terror 
attacks."

This is old, old news.  This was widely reported a few weeks or a 
few months after 9/11 and, as it says in the paragraph above, could 
only have come from those who masterminded the terror attacks.

Well, duh.  The terrorists would have been stupid if they didn't buy 
put options (I used to be licensed to sell commodity options) 
because they provide the greatest leverage for the buck.

But why are you suggesting this is some kind of sinister, special 
information, Judy?  Everyone and their mother-in-law knew about 
this?  Yawn.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to