--- In [email protected], "Nelson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <sparaig@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" <shempmcgurk@> > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], anony_sleuth_ff <no_reply > snips > > The real question you should be asking is: if it was the terrorists, > > why wasn't this made clear in subsequent investigations? > > > > The answer should be obvious: either no windfall profits (or whatever > > you call stock options trading) were actually made, or the terrorists > > were found NOT to be theones doing it. > > > > If the latter case, my guess would be that several government- related > > investments were made, probably by various Saudi royals, and it was > > too big a scandal to let that become public knowledge, even though > > the Saudis cleaned house within a few months with various royal > > cousins suddenly being lost in the desert and so on. > > > +++ It would seem logical that anyone involved in the coverup here > would be a candidate no? N. >
The BUsh family need not have been involved at all, merely covering th tracks of long-time business associates. Much along thelines of getting the Saudis out of the country shortly after 9/11. No grand conspiracy to coverup things for the sake of coverup, merely good business practice to avoid having your best business partners humiliated in public. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
