--- In [email protected], anony_sleuth_ff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <sparaig@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" <shempmcgurk@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <sparaig@> wrote: > > <snip> > > > > > So if everyone knows itw asthe terrorists who did it, why is > > > > > there no public record that it WAS the terrorists? > > > > > > > > Idiot: the media IS the public record. > > > > > > Actually, the media dropped this line of enquiry apparently. > > > > Exactly. Shemp seems to have hallucinated some > > public revelation as to who made the trades. > > > > The 9/11 commission said it had investigated the > > anomalies and that there were "innocuous explanations" > > for all of them. But it did not say what those > > explanations were, and the media never asked. > > Then why do you repeatedly state that statistically significant > anomolous trades are a matter of established fact?
Um, because they are. What do you believe is the contradiction in what I wrote above? (Hint: Providing an explanation for an anomaly does not somehow make it no longer anomalous.) Where is it > established? The commission, with all its power to call witness,and > staffs / experts oncall to do analysis could not make a definitive > case, who did? Make a definitive case for what? To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
