wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "jyouells2000" <jyouells@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], anon_couscous_ff <no_reply@>
> > wrote:
> > The chances of getting an intelligent incentives policy for energy
> > from the gov't is only slightly better than the chances of getting a
> > group of pundits in FF after all the money is collected. The energy
> > market will eventually do it, almost certainly.
>
> There are plenty of smart polcy analysts who know and promote such
> policies. Its the undemocratic nature of the US governemnt (90% of
> congressional races not competitive, 70% of states in presidential
> elections not campaigned in significantly) and the high "corruption"
> from current campaign financing that is the problem.
>
You assume that the gov't is motivated to produce an intelligent
incentive policy. Not yet. Too many other types of power and money
gains and grabs to make first. I'm sure that there are people smart
enough they just have other motivations to work through first.
JohnY
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'
SPONSORED LINKS
| Maharishi university of management | Maharishi mahesh yogi | Ramana maharshi |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
