--- In [email protected], "Patrick Gillam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- anony_sleuth_ff  wrote:
> >
> > As I said, so much for the concept of "discussion" in "discussion
> > groups". Perhaps we can just call them "ego groups".
>
> Sometimes I wonder what percentage of my posts
> may actually contribute to my ultimate awakening,
> and what percentage merely buttress my ego.
> Although you gotta love the irony of a spirituality
> discussion group that's a front for ego-reinforcement.

I think a Group is working well (best?) when the various discussions
induces, motivates,sparks one to post something, some insight,
revlation, about something they did not realize before.

Or reading posts that allow one to see the value inherent in
alternative -- even opposing views.

Not the same as being convinced by anothers argument. Though that is
good too. Particualry if it leads to a new, expanded,even opposite view.









To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'




YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to