>
> > If its ignored, then its just the same as it is now here, that is no
> > improvement, nor a worsening.
>
> You asked whether it was used or not.
Not me, sorry.
> > But do they have a twofold rating system, like I suggested with
> > positive and negative votes?
>
> It's even more detailed than that.
Okay Url?
What I meant is that, as you suggested positive ratings (expressed in
several stars) couldn't be downrated by negative ones (expressed by a
waste bin for example), both would still show up for each category you
have.
> I want to know *why* people disagree or agree, not just
> *that* they agree or disagree. I also want to know *who*
> is agreeing or disagreeing.
Here I have a solution: It could be made optional for the author to
decide if the post is rated. Some posts only serve intellectual
discussion or giving opinions, and don't have to be rated, others
serve to give information, and feedback, positive or negative doesn't
need any comments. Thus also people who just lurk can express if an
information was valuable.
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'
SPONSORED LINKS
| Maharishi university of management | Maharishi mahesh yogi | Ramana maharshi |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
