wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <sparaig@> wrote:
[...]
> > Usually a law that is open to interpretation from the get-go is
> > called "vague" and is often ruled unconstitutional merely because
> > of "vagueness." Don't know that executive orders can be
challenged
> > for that though.
> >
>
>
> Not 100% sure if it's the result of an executive order or an
> executive power, but isn't the one about whether the president can
> order wire-taps -- the thing that's under close scrutiny now --
> being challenged (at least in the court of public opinion if not a
> justice court)?
>
I don't think there's even an executive order -- just the opinion of
the Attorny General.
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'
SPONSORED LINKS
| Maharishi university of management | Maharishi mahesh yogi | Ramana maharshi |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
