--- In [email protected], Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Do you guys ever think you might have a tad too much
> pitta in your systems? I've never seen such petty
> arguing in my life.

Are you including in your comments my remarks quoted
below about the role of the Paula Jones lawsuit in
Clinton's impeachment, Peter?



>
> --- shempmcgurk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > --- In [email protected], "authfriend"
> > <jstein@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In [email protected],
> > "markmeredith2002"
> > > <markmeredith@> wrote:
> > > <snip>
> > > > You've also not responded to my post regarding
> > the dozens of
> > other
> > > > criminal allegations -- drug trafficking,
> > murder, murder coverup,
> > > > financial corruption, etc. -- made by your
> > sources throughout
> > the 90s
> > > > (which seem to be the rush and drudge crowd)
> > against the
> > clintons, all
> > > > of which were not only false, but absurd.  The
> > rape charges came
> > from
> > > > the same PR noise machine, which was well funded
> > and organized.
> > >
> > > And let's not forget the Paula Jones lawsuit.  She
> > was
> > > put up to it, and funded, by the same machine,
> > *with
> > > the specific goal of setting a perjury trap for
> > Clinton*.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > The real story of the Paula Jones "trap", as you put
> > it, Judy, is
> > that the ONLY reason Clinton was trapped was because
> > of a new law
> > that had been passed a few years earlier that was
> > draconian in its
> > nature and was destined to ruin the lives of many
> > men who would be
> > brought up on civil suit sexual harrassment charges.
> >
> > And the one politician almost singularly responsible
> > for this silly
> > law?
> >
> > Bill Clinton.
> >
> > But, of course, Judy would be the first one on the
> > lynch line if
> > those accused were some poor slob who didn't have
> > either the power
> > or the money to defend himself.  But because it was
> > Clinton she,
> > like silly partisans like Gloria Steinem, reverse
> > themselves 180
> > degrees and fall all over themselves defending a
> > Democrat.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > They hoped that during the process, he would be
> > asked
> > > about other sexual escapades and would lie about
> > them.
> > >
> > > The Monica story might never have come out
> > otherwise,
> > > because they would never have been able to get
> > Monica
> > > herself to sue him.  And if the Monica case had
> > never
> > > been exposed, it's unlikely either Willey or
> > Broaddrick
> > > could have been convinced to make their
> > accusations.
> > >
> > > Hillary was widely mocked for her "vast right-wing
> > > conspiracy" charge, but it turns out it was damn
> > close
> > > to the truth.  The various right-wing conspiracies
> > to
> > > get Clinton weren't all coordinated, but the
> > effort as
> > > a whole was indeed vast.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'




SPONSORED LINKS
Maharishi university of management Maharishi mahesh yogi Ramana maharshi


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to