>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante <no_reply@> wrote:
> <snip>
> > the mere fact that Neptune and other
> > solar system objects were not mentioned in Jyotish does not mean
> > that the existence of these objects was not appreciated (evidently
> > there is a dividing line of Jyotish significance in the solar
> > system, and Neptune etc are simply too far out to be significant
> > for Jyotish).
>
> Which line (purely coincidentally, you understand)
> *just happens* to have been drawn between the planets
> you can't possibly miss, and those that are either not
> visible or only *very* dimly visible to the naked eye
> (Uranus, Neptune, and Pluto).
>
********************
Europeans for hundreds of centuries could not distinguish between
planets and stars -- they were simply mysterious objects in the sky.
If Jyotish sages did not know the difference, many thousands of years
ago, between stars and planets, then they would have confounded the
two in setting up Jyotish (the star Sirius is brighter than Saturn),
but they did not:
http://homepage.mac.com/kvmagruder/bcp/aster/general/mag.htm
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'
SPONSORED LINKS
| Maharishi university of management | Maharishi mahesh yogi | Ramana maharshi |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
