--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> --- Rick Archer wrote:
> >
> > From a long-time lurker who occasionally posts anonymously:
> >
> > >> Wow Rick.
> > >>    
> > >>     This encounter with Curtis is scaring me. What is wrong 
with this woman?
> > >> She really has changed the flavor of FFL.
> I haven't read every post in this thread, but if I understand
> the ones I've read correctly, Curtis paid Judy rather a
> backhanded compliment by saying her posts motivated
> him to clarify his thinking on alt.m.t. some years ago.
> Judy didn't take it as a compliment, and when she asked
> him to explain how "your posts pissed me off" was
> supposed to be complimentary, Curtis declined to elaborate.
> From there flowed the exchanges in which Judy invited
> Curtis to drop it or elaborate, either one, which Curtis
> also declined.
> Have I got that right? Because I don't see the problem.

You've got the basic events right, but not the order

Here's how it went (in bare-bones form):

Curtis paid me the (very) backhanded compliment

I made it clear I didn't take it as a compliment.

Curtis said I was giving him too much credit for
being (a) clever and (b) an asshole.  He said he'd
have more to say the next day.

In response, I suggested that he really didn't want
to get me started.

The next day, Curtis (ignoring my advice) wanted to
know why I hadn't taken his post as complimentary.

I told him.

Curtis (ignoring what I told him) asked again why
I hadn't taken his post as complimentary.

I asked him to explain what the compliment was.

Curtis decided I had been right that he didn't want
to get me started, and realized he didn't want to
attempt to answer my question. So he backed out of
the discussion.

To subscribe, send a message to:

Or go to:
and click 'Join This Group!'

Maharishi university of management Maharishi mahesh yogi Ramana maharshi


Reply via email to