On May 21, 2006, at 12:00 PM, shempmcgurk wrote:

> Quantum mechanics, Unified State and Consciousness...this was all,
> as far as I could tell, analogy.

Good point. We had discussed this here before. A good friend of mine 
let me look over all his MIU course work which back then was all 
privately printed. They made it a point of drawing these connections 
extensively in the early coursework but then would state at the end 
these were analogies and that you could only take analogies so far.

However eventually this was supplanted with the idea that 
consciousness *was* the unified field--and thus the infamous Hagelin 
article where he gave up his own expert view (that consciousness was 
*not* the unified field) for the insistence of his teacher that 
consciousness *was* the unified field of all the laws of nature. In 
other words he threw his own credibility out the window in order to 
stay close to M.

>
> And I suppose analogy is fine when it comes to helping one
> understand complex and abstract ideas, which Physics is full of. For
> example, we've often heard the analogy of the two twins that leave
> Earth at the same time in two separate spacecrafts, one travelling
> at the speed of light and the other at a lesser speed and one comes
> back older than the other.
>
> But I could never tell where the line was with MMY: was this all
> just an analogy or was it describing the reality?

See the above. Originally it was a provocative analogy, later it 
became the operating mythos.

In reality it is probably *prana* that is the unified field. Oops. Oh 
well, it was a good marketing spiel while it lasted...

Interesting, in Nirukta, prana literally means "first unit of energy".



To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'




SPONSORED LINKS
Maharishi university of management Maharishi mahesh yogi Ramana maharshi


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to