--- In [email protected], "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], "matrixmonitor" 
> > <matrixmonitor@> wrote:
> > > Q's lesson:  think twice before messing with the past. an 
> > > alternative past may turn out worse than the "real" past.
> > 
> > It's occurred to me to wonder (fancifully) whether
> > the fact that we never seem to be able to nail down
> > the details of what actually happened in major
> > catastrophes--there always seem to be masses of
> > contradictory evidence, leading to all kinds of
> > conspiracy theories--is a function of people from
> > various times in the future coming back to try to
> > alter the events in different ways in an attempt
> > to make their futures turn out better.
> > 
> > In other words, no such major event happened *just
> > one way*, but rather several different ways, all
> > superimposed on each other, all with different
> > details.
> > 
> > It would make a good science fiction story, at any
> > rate!
> >
> 
> Check out _Thrice Upon a Time_ by James P Hogan for one exploration 
of this.
> 
> Rather than "coming back from the future," the researchers discover 
that they have an 
> extremely limited way of communicating with themselves in the very 
recent past (24 hour 
> time limit).
> 
> http://www.jamesphogan.com/books/thrice/baen00/titlepage.shtml'
> 
> 
>  There's also  the TV show, "7 Days," about "Project Backstep," 
which allows a single 
> "chrononaught" to travel back in time 7 days and attempt to avert 
disaster. 
> 
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Days
> 
> 
> There's also Benedict from Roger Zelazny's Amber series, who, as 
Knight-Marshal of 
> Amber, would "Walk through Shadow" and view a battle from various 
viewpoints with 
> slightly different conditions in order to test his theories of War.
> 
> All of these assume that there is only ONE observed "reality," 
regardless of how many 
> potential realities there are, but that's the only interpretation 
of QM that I've heard of. Even 
> the "Many Worlds" theory doesn't allow for multiple observations 
once an event is actually 
> observed.
> 
> A few more fantasy-oriented stories have examined something along 
this line, though. In 
> Jordan's Wheel of Time series, there is a use of the One Power 
called "balefire" which 
> actually removes an object from all existence. The more power used, 
the further back its 
> "thread" is burned out of the Pattern. It's the ultimate Deus Ex 
Machina in the series since 
> any event can be undone. The drawback is that while *people* might 
have confused 
> memories of the original object (or creature), the physical effects 
of that object are undone 
> in time, which makes for rather bizarre contradictions. The more 
power used, the more 
> dangerous the contradictions. Rather than merely killing your 
grandfather, what if you 
> destroy the birthplace of your grandfather, 200 years into the 
past? What happens to 
> Reality in that kind of situation?

Thanks for all the cites, Lawson.  I've read quite a
few time-travel stories over the years--I'm a big fan
of Hogan--but some others you mention are new to me,
and I'll check 'em out.  I haven't found one yet
that homes in on exactly the situation I came up with,
though.

Another really good one is "The X President," by
Philip Baruth; it's deliciously written and features
dead-on sketches of Bill Clinton at the age of 109 
and as a teenager: 

http://tinyurl.com/mx4dq






------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Great things are happening at Yahoo! Groups.  See the new email design.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/iDk17A/hOaOAA/i1hLAA/UlWolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to