--- In [email protected], new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], Bhairitu <noozguru@> wrote:
> >
> > And I *do* want to make it clear the progressive tax would work 
this 
> > way: once you had an estate valued at 12 million the progressive 
tax 
> > would kick in.  
> 
> At what rate(s)? At the current 35-60% (aproximate numbers)
> progressively? Or are you actually suggesting a a 100% tax after 12
> million? If so ---- Wow! O to 100% taxataion at 12 million!!! Wow!!
> Nothing AT ALL progressive about that. Progresive taxes have a long
> hist ory, NO ONE that I can recall has ever suggesting anthing so
> draconian.
> 
> Still, your proposal is far more liberal than current laws that 
start
> taxation  at just over a million and then tax at 35 to 60 %
> progressively.





In 2006, the estate tax exemption is $2,000,000 per person 
($4,000,000 for a married couple) and that's going up to $3,500,000 
per person in a few years.

The highest rate is 46% (it starts at, I think, about 38%).







> So its interesting that you want to abolish the current
> 60% tax on estates over 3-4 million up to 12 million? (I forget 
what
> bracket the final highest rate kicks in) I never took you to be 
such a
> strong advocate for abolishing the current tax on estates 1-12 mil,
> and the 60%+ tax on estates ~4-12 million. Ultra liberals never 
cease
> to amaze me.
> 
> Or are you under the delusion that there currently is no estate 
tax?
> And ranting about nothing?
>  
> >Smart people would retire probably spend more time one 
> > their favorite charities, travel the world etc.   I would 
probably do 
> > that at even 4 million. 
> 
> I imagine those that accumulated 12 million are generally smarter 
than
> you and will make thier own decisions without the need t o be 
informed
> about your personal preferences. Hard to beleive, sad, but true.
> 
> Or they would continue to work and pump all the post 12 million 
into
> charitable trusts. knowing  they could do some good things with the
> money and be more effective than gov't programs.
> 
> > Right now we have people with too much money 
> > making bad decisions effecting too many people.
> 
> Um you sound a bit disgruntled? If the market rules are fair (which
> they are currently not perfect) what is gained by capping incomes
> other than throwing water in incentives -- the fuel of innovation.
> 
> >  They are not gods.  
> 
> Oh you now sound really disgrungled. Bad experience in the elevator
> with a snotty exec?
> 
> > Take away their excess wealth and bring them back to reason.  
> 
> Ah, I see.
>






------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Check out the new improvements in Yahoo! Groups email.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/6pRQfA/fOaOAA/yQLSAA/UlWolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to