On Jul 5, 2006, at 2:03 PM, new.morning wrote: --- In [email protected], Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There are further flaws of the concept once we look more closely at the Kyoto Protocol itself. These include the carbon accounting framework of the Kyoto Protocol and environmental and social shortcomings.
Due to these (fixable) flaws, are you implying that you advocate that all signers of the Kyoto treaty disavow it? Are you siding with US policy not to sign it? Are you against international action to improve the historic carbon balance?
Improve yes, not start a carbon commodity market that will benefit the same corps that caused the problem in the first place. Duh.
Are you suggesting and advocating that we throw the baby out with the bathwater?
No, I like babies.
Or are you simply implying that because Kyoto, as any treaty or contract has flaws, that efforts should be made to fix them?
Of course they should--but we need to also transition to cleaner fuels and not use these technologies as an excuse to sustain our over dependence on fossil fuels.
__._,_.___
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'
![]()
SPONSORED LINKS
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
__,_._,___
|
