--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], Vaj <vajranatha@> wrote: > > > On Jul 15, 2006, at 4:04 AM, TurquoiseB wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <sparaig@> wrote: > > > >> --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> > > wrote: > > > >>> --- In [email protected], "Alex Stanley" > > > >>> <j_alexander_stanley@> wrote: > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Personally, I have no need or desire for a guru or other > > > >>>> savior figure. But, there certainly is a very long tradition > > > >>>> of devotion to a guru, and it just struck me that being > > > >>>> devoted to MMY or Punditji is no different than MMY being > > > >>>> devoted to Guru Dev. > > > >>> > > > >>> I would suggest that there is a difference. You > > > >>> probably would never have seen the other disciples > > > >>> of Guru Dev obsessing about former fellow disciples > > > >>> who had moved on, and spending hours badrapping them. > > > >>> That's a Western addition to "guru yoga," and IMO > > > >>> it's not an improvement. > > > >> > > > >> So who here is a disciple of Gurudev? > > > > > > > > THAT is an example of the intentional desire to > > > > mislead and deflect discussions Vaj was talking > > > > about. No one on earth is stupid enough to have > > > > gotten "folks here are disciples of Guru Dev" > > > > from what I wrote. > > > > Actually, it's easy to see how Lawson could have > > gotten that idea if he didn't read what Alex said > > that Barry was responding to, to get the context. > > > > > The fact that several people on this list routinely attempt such > > > deflection, almost continuously, should tell us something. > > > > Except that, as I pointed out, there's nowhere the > > discussion could have been deflected *to* based on > > Lawson's question, other than eliciting a correction > > from Barry. > > > > Oh, wait, there's also the deflection *Barry* attempted-- > > quite successfully, with Vaj's ready assistance--to the > > bogus issue of Lawson's integrity. > > > > And Vaj, of course, routinely attempts to deflect > > discussions of something peculiar *he* has said by, > > instead of explaining it, accusing commenters of being > > incapable of understanding because they've drunk the > > TM Kool-Aid. > > > > And Barry does the same with virtually all personal > > criticisms of his thinking. > > > > What should it tell us that Barry and Vaj do exactly the > > same thing they accuse TMers of doing, I wonder? > > It's one of the true wonders of the world -- how > can someone who is post-menopausal be so consistently > on the rag? :-) >>>.
You are pathetic. Stay off the bottle. Are you that guy I saw in Paris with the pock-marked face lying in the gutter clutching a almost empty bottle of vino and mumbling about the good 'ol days when you could still get it up? I think you must be, the way you talk. OffWorld To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
