In a message dated 7/20/06 10:59:01 A.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED].. wrote:
[...]
>
> Spair,check my post regarding this. I saw the ashram in Rishikesh and stayed
> there about two weeks in October and November of '73. While the place was
> run down then, there was not that much to it. Not many completed buildings a
> few uncompleted and cheaply made. It would have been nice enough for what it
> was needed for back then but nothing fancy.
>

That's completely at odds with the description Vaj provided, I think.

Not really, Spair. the buildings were few, not a big complex. However things can be decorated to look nice, festive and make one comfortable. Again, the buildings are the key and they were not expensive to build in India. Remember labor and materials are and were dirt cheap in India, especially in the sixties. I can only picture a few, maybe a half dozen bungalows at best and one larger two story building with maybe about 8 double rooms and one similar that was under construction but never finished. There was also a meeting hall and some meditation "caves" built below ground level. I don't think the place was ever designed  to hold much more than about 50 course participants at one time.
__._,_.___

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'





YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




__,_._,___

Reply via email to