--- In [email protected], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > In a message dated 7/30/06 7:09:10 P.M. Central Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > She left people to ponder whether Clinton was a > latent homosexual, actually. > > As I said, her intention was to give her nutjob > fans yet another spurious reason to hate Clinton. > > How many people do you know or have heard of that think Clinton > is a homosexual, really?
None, but then I don't move in nutjob right-wing circles. I doubt it occurred to anybody before Coulter proposed it, but it would be interesting to take a poll now that she has. > I used to think he was just trying to develop the JFK image > as a stud, but later began to think there might actually be some > insecurity about himself. Well, of course he has some insecurity about himself. Many utterly straight guys do, and it often manifests as promiscuity. But it doesn't have to do with whether they're worried that they're gay, or with their sexuality in general, for that matter. It's a power thing. And JFK didn't *have* an image as a stud. That was a big secret at the time, in case you've forgotten. If Clinton was trying to develop an image as a stud, it was his own image of himself he wanted to boost. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
