On Aug 4, 2006, at 6:35 AM, Robert Gimbel wrote:



He used to, then he broke with M.


Somewhere in between we realized (or already saw) where M. was  

stealing the info. from: his pundits.



We did??


What evidence do we have of this?




Since he's not fluent in Sanskrit, he has to have help with the 


translation. This is ripping the 


pundits off, according to Vaj...



Oh, so, if Maharishi need a translator, because he was studying 

physics, and becoming enlightened, instead of studying Sanskrit;

We have to hold this against him, and consider this stealing.

Please, please give the old man a break!


No, he rarely credits source texts he is paraphrasing or expounding on. People end up assuming he "cognized it". This seems to be deliberate. This is often mixed in with the false idea that he actually is a rishi because of the assumed name. The most infamous example would be "AGNI" and the unfoldment of Vedic literature, etc., etc. Can anyone name the source text? Thought it was "cognized" or part of the mysterious Apaurushaya Bhasya? Think again.


__._,_.___

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'





YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




__,_._,___

Reply via email to