scienceofabundance wrote: >--- In [email protected], Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> > >---snip--- > > >>>No , you missed it. "my point" was had the terrorist been >>> >>> >successful you > > >>>would have been demanding another investigation as to how this >>> >>> >could happen, as > > >>>you just did, see above. As for me, I thought the official 911 >>> >>> >investigation > > >>>was simply a political circus. And no I don't think this is a >>> >>> >setup but I'm > > >>>sure you are going to wish it were. >>> >>> >>> >>No, you are *assuming* why I want an independent 9-11 >> >> >investigation. I > > >>think the "official story" is a cover-up and 9-11 was an inside >> >> >job and > > >>a failed false flag operation. That's why I don't trust this >> >> >alert > > >>especially due to it's timing. >> >> >> >But, aren't you both assuming that neither of you is assuming >the "official" 9-11 investigation was, in reality, carried out under >the assumption (or at least the assumption of the two of you) that >the "official story" was NOT actually an inside job (assuming of >course that you have agreed to assume the recent alert was (at least >I assume it was) an "official" official alert, which is true >regardless of whether or not the independent alert was or was not an >inside job? You both would agree with this, I assume? > Cute obfuscation. Let's see if you can write that more straightforward. Maybe Judy can help you. :)
To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
