--- In [email protected], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > In a message dated 8/10/06 8:33:39 P.M. Central Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > >>So you weren't pulling for an independent investigation of 911? > >> > >> > >> > >An independent investigation of 9-11 would be great and is very needed. > > > > > > > >My point > > > And so you don't believe the "official version" either and also admit > that this alert might be bogus or a setup? > > > > > No , you missed it. "my point" was had the terrorist been successful you > would have been demanding another investigation as to how this could happen, as > you just did, see above. As for me, I thought the official 911 investigation > was simply a political circus. And no I don't think this is a setup but I'm > sure you are going to wish it were. >
These conspiracy theorists remind me of what happened with the JFK assassination: for about 35 years, a great many people believed there was more than one shooter. And then new sophisticated computer models became available proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that Oswald was the lone gunman. Now you don't hear any more theories about there being multiple shooters. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
