--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> 
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" 
<shempmcgurk@> 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> 
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <sparaig@> 
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" 
<jstein@> 
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" 
<sparaig@> 
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > In a message dated 8/11/06 3:21:40 P.M. Central 
> Daylight 
> > > > Time,  
> > > > > > > > sparaig@ writes:
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > If you support abortion, you can't be against 
> aborting 
> > > > female 
> > > > > > > > > fetuses.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > You can if the ONLY reason is because they're  female.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > It's a mothers right to choose. Women have the right 
> to 
> > > > decide if 
> > > > > > > > they want to carry a child regardless of it's sex.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Perhaps, but the social issue is overwhelming the 
> > individual 
> > > > rights 
> > > > > > > in this case. The individual's right to choose is 
> leading 
> > to 
> > > > > > > exceedingly lopsided male-female ratios that may 
> > > > > > > well destroy Chinese and Indian society if left 
> unregulated.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I don't know how the heck you'd regulate it.  Ban
> > > > > > the aborting of female fetuses but not male?  How
> > > > > > long would it be before you had an imbalance the
> > > > > > other way?
> > > > > 
> > > > > Ban anything that can be used to determine the sex of the 
> > > > > fetus. Ultrasound while the mom isn't allowed to look, 
would 
> be 
> > > > > OK, as long as the doctor doesn't reveal the sex.
> > > > 
> > > > Hey, that might actually work.
> > > 
> > > So let me see if understand this.
> > > 
> > > Judy is all for the right of a mother-to-be to kill her fetus
> > 
> > ("Woman" would be the appropriate term in this
> > case.)
> > 
> >  but 
> > > she's for banning her right to know what that soon-to-be-dead 
> > > fetus' sex is????
> > 
> > What I'm against is abortion based on the
> > sex of the fetus.
> 
> ...AND you want to codify the banning of this personal choice into 
> law...
> 
> How does that differ from codifying into law the banning of the 
> personal choice of an abortion?

It's the lesser of two evils, as I said already.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to