--- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> > wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" <shempmcgurk@> > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <sparaig@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <sparaig@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], MDixon6569@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In a message dated 8/11/06 3:21:40 P.M. Central > Daylight > > > > Time, > > > > > > > > sparaig@ writes: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you support abortion, you can't be against > aborting > > > > female > > > > > > > > > fetuses. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You can if the ONLY reason is because they're female. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's a mothers right to choose. Women have the right > to > > > > decide if > > > > > > > > they want to carry a child regardless of it's sex. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps, but the social issue is overwhelming the > > individual > > > > rights > > > > > > > in this case. The individual's right to choose is > leading > > to > > > > > > > exceedingly lopsided male-female ratios that may > > > > > > > well destroy Chinese and Indian society if left > unregulated. > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't know how the heck you'd regulate it. Ban > > > > > > the aborting of female fetuses but not male? How > > > > > > long would it be before you had an imbalance the > > > > > > other way? > > > > > > > > > > Ban anything that can be used to determine the sex of the > > > > > fetus. Ultrasound while the mom isn't allowed to look, would > be > > > > > OK, as long as the doctor doesn't reveal the sex. > > > > > > > > Hey, that might actually work. > > > > > > So let me see if understand this. > > > > > > Judy is all for the right of a mother-to-be to kill her fetus > > > > ("Woman" would be the appropriate term in this > > case.) > > > > but > > > she's for banning her right to know what that soon-to-be-dead > > > fetus' sex is???? > > > > What I'm against is abortion based on the > > sex of the fetus. > > ...AND you want to codify the banning of this personal choice into > law... > > How does that differ from codifying into law the banning of the > personal choice of an abortion?
It's the lesser of two evils, as I said already. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
