--- In [email protected], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > In a message dated 8/12/06 7:21:12 A.M. Central Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > > Ban anything that can be used to determine the sex of the > > > > fetus. Ultrasound while the mom isn't allowed to look, would be > > > > OK, as long as the doctor doesn't reveal the sex. > > > > > > Hey, that might actually work. > > > > So let me see if understand this. > > > > Judy is all for the right of a mother-to-be to kill her fetus > > ("Woman" would be the appropriate term in this > case.) > > but > > she's for banning her right to know what that soon-to-be-dead > > fetus' sex is???? > > What I'm against is abortion based on the > sex of the fetus. > > > > > > But Judy, the mother doesn't have to give a reason why she wants to abort a > fetus. She doesn't even have to tell the ultra sound tech or doctor she has > any plans to abort and she has every right to know the sex of the fetus as > she would the general health of the fetus at the time of ultra sound. >
We're talking China and India here, not the USA or other culture that might wipe itself out with sex-skewed birth practices. Of course, if you see China as the "Great Enemy," perhaps you should encourage such practices. Just be aware that the death throws of a country with a billion people wouldn't be pretty and might destroy the world. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
