--- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> > wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" <shempmcgurk@> > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <sparaig@> wrote: > > <snip> > > > > What Shemp doesn't get is that this has nothing to do with > > > moral/ethical issues, _per se_, > > > > but with the serious consequences of a sex-biased culture > acting > > > as-a-whole to skew the > > > > birth rate in favor of one sex over the other. > > > > > > Of course I get that...it would be a disaster...but, sorry, > those > > > are the consequences of supporting abortion. And, yes, you > > > necessarily get one with the other. > > > > Um, no, wrong. What you get without abortion > > is an even worse disaster. > > Oh, I see. > > Without abortion, we get a greater disaster because more human > lives are created with a pretty much equal number of men and women > being born versus the situation we'd get with abortion along with > no law banning sex-screening which would result in LESS human lives > created with less females than males being born. > > Wonderful logic there, Stein.
No, just very elementary logic, which you've completely missed, as usual. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
