--- In [email protected], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > In a message dated 8/12/06 10:04:29 A.M. Central Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > So you acknowledge that not allowing the mother to > know the sex of a child would be a lesser evil, I > presume. > > > > Yes it would be a lesser evil if it meant saving the life of the fetus, but > we don't make Chinese laws. I don't think the Chinese really look on the > issue as being a major problem worth solving. If anything they probably look > on > their current policy as a damned good solution. >
In fact, I don't know what the Chinese solution is. I know that the Indian government, at one point, was banning the study of any practice or procedure that might influence the sex of baby before conception and I seem to recall issues about finding out the sex DURING pregnancy, but I may be wrong. I was merely proposing the ultra-sound sex-determination thing as a possible solution to China's problem and even there, there's the issue of known sex-linked birth defects that might make a pregancy *dangerous* to continue. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
