--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "qntmpkt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- I disagree. You disagree with what specifically. My rhetorical questions and observations are along the points of you raise.
Speculating on which actions are Dharmic, whether in > E'd or non-E'd people is all speculative; and due to the paradoxes of > Brahman and the possibility of getting embroiled in circulatory > "Advaita-speak"; we are left with making wholly commonsense, logical, > (experiential and theoretical when appropriate) conclusions about the > nature of actions; some of which can be evaluated using standard > academic, scientific tools. Have you read any of my posts? Did you somehow get confused that I am against the use of standard academic, scientific tools?. > There's no need to nitpick on the nature > of science or what's common sense. There are obvious disagreements > and that's the nature of life. > The point is, that trying to figure out right vs wrong, Dharmic vs > a-Dharmic is an unsolvable conundrum when placed into the context of > what we "think" E'd people vs non-E'd people are doing; (if consistent > with Dharma or not). Which was my point. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
