--- In [email protected], new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <sparaig@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], new.morning <no_reply@> wrote: > > > <snip> > > > > I read DOJ's analysis. Its distrurbing that it is so shallow and has > > > > so many unaddressed (or only partially addressed) questionable > > > > metheodological issues. > > > > > > Why don't you email him your analysis and see if > > > he has a rebuttal? > > > > > > > Of course, I didn't see his webpage as presenting any massively > persuasive evidence of the > > ME in Fairfield and I suspect he doesn't either. > > He closes, "it can be seen from this study that MIU/MUM had a > consistent, dramatic effect on Fairfield crime for almost 20 years." I > interpret that as he is pretty convinced of an ME effect in FF. A > higher level of conviction than you appear to have. >
He didn't say "ME has had effect," but "MIU/MUM had effects." Perhaps hge meant that the ME had the effect, but I noted the phrasing. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
