--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "wayback71" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Gerbal, I am guessing that at this point, Judy and Sparaig read and respond to each other's > posts, but not many other people do - at least not regularly. > snip> > >
Hi, Way -- I'm just getting caught up since I looked in last. I noticed that Judy and Lawson monopolized the newsgroup for many messages. I don't read their drivel, but I was sort of wondering if their private mutual admiration set was a contest to see who could insert his/her nose the fartherest up the other's butt. They are getting to be more and more turd clones of each other. -- best watched from a distance, I suppose, like a train wreck or the TMO. > Sal wrote: > > > Judy, you are making distinctions with no visible difference at > > all. > > > You're implying that people *may* go around routinely saying things > > > they may or may not believe, so that invalidates what Barry (and > > > others) claim MMY said. That's insane. *Nobody* in the world goes > > > around appending "and what I just said I firmly believe to be > > true," to > > > every statement, or to any of them for that matter. Most people say > > > what they believe to be true at that point in time-- unless they > > are > > > purposely trying to deceive--and leave it at that. It's what most > > > communication is based on. What you are putting forth basically > > means > > > the end of any and all honest communication. > > > > > > If this is what you really believe, how to you ever get a > > conversation > > > going with anyone? > > > > > > Sal > gerbal wrote: > > Careful, Sal, she'll try to banish you! 8-)8-] 8-} -- you'll be sent > > to some far off place to "go and teach". > > > > Judy doesn't have conversations; from what I can gather from her odd > > way of stating what she calls obvious, she simply transforms her > > version of a statement into a convoluted notion of events or > > statements she feels comfortable arguing with or putting down; she > > just enjoys the thought that she can influence the thinking of > > others. > > > > She used to be sharper and could actually zero in on relatively > > useful false statements of conclusions or false reasoning. But these > > days she's simply getting weird. I think the last thing I saw of hers > > was something to the effect that she didn't defend Mahesh (or wasn't > > defending Mahesh), she was simply pointing out the feasibility of his > > (and I forget the rest). It seemed like she was saying she didn't > > defend him, she just defended him. I don't know if anyone made any > > mention of it because it was simply too off the wall to bother with. I > > m sure she'll dig it out, re-post it, defend it and point out my > > shortcomings as if it mattered; but to her, I suppose it does. > > > > Maybe (as in MAYBE) Mahesh managed to influence the way people > > thought; the TMO would seem to be an apt example. But you, like so > > many others, have seen through Judy's very sad and pityable state of > > need. I guess she has followers, Lawson seems to have his nose > > permanently affixed in one of her orifices, but I can't see she has > > an actual following. > > > > Keep up the good work Sal. We always need to be reminded that fancy > > words are not necessarily meaningful words and are not always likly > > to be coming from a good and well intentioned source. > > > To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
