--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <sparaig@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <sparaig@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "hugheshugo" > > > > > <richardhughes103@> wrote: > > > > > <snip> > > > > > > The thing that annoys me most about this is when someone on > > > here > > > > > > forwards peoples free-thinking posts to their national > office > > > in an > > > > > > attempt to get them in "trouble". Isn't it just the most > > > pathetic > > > > > > thing you ever heard? If people can't deal with things > directly > > > > > they > > > > > > should go play somewhere else, it's not like there isn't a > > > warning > > > > > > on the home page. > > > > > > > > > > > > What starts on the net should stay on the net. > > > > > > > > > > > > By the way it wasn't hard to work out who it was, but are > they > > > big > > > > > > enough to admit it? > > > > > > > > > > Wow. If anyone is really doing this, you should > > > > > say who it is so Rick can ban them from the group. > > > > > > > > > > That's truly reprehensible. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why? From the TBer's viewpoint, some people who post to on FFL > > > > are definitely "off the program" and lying about it to get into > > > > the Domes. > > > > > > Which people who post on FFL?? Did I miss something? > > > > Ones who have other gurus and so on. I assume that SOME of them > > want to be on the course or otherwise have something to do with > > the TMO or it would make no sense to "report them to National." > > Well, something to do with the TMO, maybe, although > I'm not aware any of the off-the-program folks here > who have anything to do with the TMO, are you? > > > And it would make no sense for you to consider the actions of the > tattle-tales as > > "reprensible" unless you thought there was some specific > consequence of the action. I > > mean, if no-one cares, why would someone's actions > be "reprehensible" rather than > > merely silly? > > Why on earth would you assume "no one cares"? >
Unless someone has some desire to participate in TMO functions, why would they or anyone else (such as officials of some kind in the TMO) care what is said on this forum? To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
