--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <sparaig@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], Bhairitu <noozguru@> wrote: > <snip> > > > And with today's DVDs the setups and rehearsals for many > > > stunts like these are shown in the extras including how > > > the cars are often modified. > > > > That wasn't a stunt. It was a sure bet for CGI except the > > firm that did it conned the producers into footing the bill > > for live-action. > > > > IMHO of course. > > Look at it again...that ain't no CGI. Just for one > thing, for CGI they'd have conceived and designed it > differently, more closeups, more visually intelligible. > It's hard to figure out exactly what's happening in some > parts of it; and it's obvious that some parts of it > *just barely* make it. It's not all that smooth, which > is what makes it so breathtaking. >
I understand. I just don't consider a rube goldberg apparatus a "stunt." To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
