--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, t3rinity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > It just strikes me that those who claim to believe > > > in Maharishi's theory *should* have an intellectual > > > problem with running into the individual conscious- > > > ness of someone they consider enlightened who died. > > > It seems to me that if they truly believe that > > > they've encountered Guru Dev's individual conscious- > > > ness that they should believe that Maharishi is > > > wrong about his "drop returning to the ocean" theory. > > MMY has specifically told, that its not possible to pray to Brahman, > as it is impersonal. Somebody concluded from this, that it would also > not be possible to pray to GD as he supposed that he completely merged > with It. MMY interupted the person stating that this is not what he > had told, and that one could very well pray to GD, that he would be > IOW be available on an individual level. > > So you are confusing things again. While union with Brahman is > possible even in this life, where an individuality is still available > in its external form, why should then this form not be available on a > different level after physical death. He can still be 'one with > Brahman' while still retaining a subtle form on a higher level, for > whatever work. >
Or, in Star Trek terms, Odo maniefests to chat with Kyra. Does a separate Odo exist when he is NOT chatting with kyra? To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
