--- In [email protected], new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > As for being a liar, nothing > > > he has said has caused me to lose money or sleep, so what of it? > > .. > > I guess I wouldn't want to share a bottle of wine > > with you either. > > So, no lunch with Curtis, Barry or Jim. > > Vaj would seem to be a difinite no, though he appears > to be long gone. As is Cliff.
I'm not aware that Cliff ever lied, actually. > I am guessing I am out, "convos go nowhere" . Have you been lying? If so, I haven't noticed. > Geezer definately is out. Where did he lie? > You still seem silently seething about some perceived slight of > Rick's, I am guessing he is on the no lunch list too. He's definitely on the list, but not because I'm "seething" over a "slight." Once somebody has stabbed you in the back, you tend to wipe them off your lunch list PDQ and simply make a mental note that they aren't to be trusted. No "seething" required. > Sal is definately out. When Sal is on the losing end of an argument that she started, she starts using dishonest debating tactics, but they're so transparent they hardly constitute lying. As far as I'm aware, she's never lied on this forum. > Maybe Dr. Pete, but you know he would just proposition you for > tantra sex (for new readers -- old post referenece, jk) Never Dr. Pete! He's not a liar (that I know of). > I seem to recall Feste is on your bad list -- though perhaps I am > mistaken. You're mistaken. Feste once misunderstood something I said and reacted badly, but I think we cleared that up. > Shemp is out. Shemp's definitely out. > If you would eat with Off-World and Peter Klutz -- seeing them > as the two "sane ones" -- all I can say is "whew". Again, I don't recall ever seeing either of them lie. > Spairag I guess would make the list. Good grief, no. Lawson is honest to a fault. > Anyone else? You left out gerbal. > It seems odd that you interact copiuously with a group > of people that you appear to have no respect for -- and > would not even break bread with. Care to share the > motivation? They're a subgroup of people I *do* have respect for, enjoy interacting with, and would break bread with any time. I'd vastly prefer it if that subgroup would just go away until they learn to be honest, but failing that, I'm going to call attention to it when they lie, because such people make life more difficult for everybody. > > My excuse has always been, > > "The French hate the Germans > The Germans hate the Poles. > Italians hate Yugoslavs > South Africans hate the Dutch > And I don't like anybody very much" > > KT > To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
