--- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], new.morning <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > I am guessing you feel your argument is actually valid, > > > > new morning, go take your medication now, please. > > > > > I'm on meds; new.morning is on meds. > > Everybody's on meds, I guess, eh Judy? > Maybe its a preliminary step to Brahman: seeing [people needing] meds everywhere.
But don't worry shemp. Judy had made it clear, the statement on meds are: - not not part of a logical argument. (Perhaps non-logical?) - not even arguments. They thus appear to be irrelevant points made with no connection to the post itself. - [by implication] not made to disparage the poster and by implication the poster's points or post (since that would be part of an argument/attack strategy) Perhaps they are simply a reflection of poor writing (irrelevance) and rude, ill-mannered outbursts. Kind of sad for her to end up irrelevant, rude and ill-mannered. Afterall those years of TM. (I bet GeezerFreak has a more pithy way of phrasing that.) Instead, I am hoping its the pre-Brahman thing. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
