--- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" > <shempmcgurk@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@> > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], MDixon6569@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > In a message dated 9/20/06 3:46:03 P.M. Central Daylight > Time, > > > > jflanegi@ writes: > > > > > > > > California Sues GM, Ford, Toyota Over Global Warming > (Update1) > > > > > > > > I agree. These automakers lack of social responsibility is > > > appalling- > > > > where they must be sued or legislated into making any > socially > > > > responsible changes at all. Ever survived a car accident? If > so, > > > thank > > > > your seat belts, airbags, etc. which were mandated by > > legislation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Maybe individuals should sue the state of California for > giving > > > licenses to > > > > Auto dealers to sell a harmful product just so they could > > collect > > > the tax > > > > revenues from the sales. > > > > > > > Your sarcasm reminds me of Gordon Gekko in 'Wall Street'- "Greed > > is > > > good". > > > > > > > > > I think his logic is as good or better than the legislators that > > proposing suing the auto manufacturers... > > > Logic is neutral. So academically any logical statement is as good > as any other logical statement. Birth control and genocide are both > equally good logical proposals to the problem of overpopulation. > > The key is, which one is more socially responsible? > > Hence my comment to MDixon's remark. Logically either making it > impossible to sell cars in California, or forcing the auto > manufacturers to make less polluting vehicles are equally logical > proposals to curbing global warming. Only one of the proposals > serves the public good in a realistic way. > > I am positive you can guess which one.
Here's one for you: if you believe that global warming is a real threat, don't drive. > > Besides, if you are against government control, why do you support > the Huge Deficit, Tax and Spend, Big Government Republicans?? > Had you ever read my many posts on precisely those subjects you'd know my views on them and wouldn't assume that I support them. Why do you assume what you do above? What prejudicial mode of thinking would make you think I support precisely those things that I have come out against? To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
