On Oct 4, 2006, at 8:37 AM, Alex Stanley wrote:

--- In [email protected], "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

wrote:



--- In [email protected], off_world_beings 

<no_reply@> wrote:



This is very funny:


http://www3.capwiz.com/y/bio/?id=178





Uh, which Republican are you referring to?


Foley?


1) He didn't molest anyone...


2) Had he had consensual physical relations with the boy in question 

there would have been no crime committed because the boy was over 

the age of consent.


I am concerned with the draconian internet laws that are raking this 

guy over the coals.  Sure, it was inappropriate speech but it was 

speech none-the-less and it was internet speech...and we, as regular 

users of the internet, should be bloody well outraged.



Outraged that the smug, hypocritical asshole who helped create that

law is getting bitchslapped by it? You gotta be kidding!



While watching someone attacking their own shadow is a sure sign of lack of light/dark integration, it's often very entertaining to watch! Interestingly it works both ways, like when dire homophobes were observed while watching gay porn with devices that measured their erection responses. Oops! Ain't life fun.
__._,_.___

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

Reply via email to