> sparaig <spare egg/ Lawson English> wrote: > > coldbluiceman wrote: > > > "sparaig" <sparaig/Lawson English> wrote: > > > > coldbluiceman wrote: > > > > > "sparaig" <spare egg/Lawson English> wrote: > > > > > Y'know, maybe I can't read the stilted > > > > > language of the Indian Courts properly, > > > > > or maybe I > > > > > simply can't understand your points > > > > >(or both), > > > > > > > > Namaste Sir Lawson, > > > > Then please allow to clarify, and give you the gest of the > > > > tired "Old Anoop Chandola Story", > > > > and the fabrications of truth > > > > contained in Swami Shantanand's book > > > > -'Om Sri Jyothirmath'. > > > > > > > > First of all: > > > > (1) Regarding the "will" of Sri BrahmanandJi. > > > > None of the civil lawsuits were framed > > > > around the vaildity of > > > > the "will". > > > > .."Thus, none of the civil suits in > > > > this dispute seems to have been > > > > framed in terms of contesting the > > > > legal bona fides of Brahmananda's > > > > will..." > > > > http://www.ucl.ac.uk/~ucgadkw/position/shank-jyot-ascii.html > > > <snip> > > > As I said, one of us is misreading > > > what the court has said... > > > As I quoted to you twice from the > higher court's summary, the lower court > found that the > willl was valid... O well...
Namaste Sir Lawson, The validity of the "will" means exactly this.. there were five names on a piece of paper that was *Published after Sri BrahmanandJi passed away*..,that is an *Undisputed Legal Fact* by the Lower Court and Supreme Court and by both parties-, the Resondent/Ramji Tripathi-Shantinand, and the Plaintiffs. http://www.austlii.edu.au/~andrew/CommonLII/INSC/1974/153.html The plaintiffs in the court case suggested to the court the order had been reversed, as Swami Shantinand was the last choice and the poorest choice..,as it was *Factually Established* Shantinand/Ramji Tripathi could not comprehend nor read sanskrit http://www.austlii.edu.au/~andrew/CommonLII/INSC/1974/153.html and - http:// www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg20687.html That being said lets, look again at the *Facts* that Sir LawsonJi continues to ignore(as that is afforded by *Blind Faith*). It is a Historical Fact that Ramji Tripathi aka Swami Shantinand fabricated a story and published his *Om Sri Jyotirmath*. Now my question to you- Sir Lawson Ji is.. *Why was it nessaccary for Swami Shantanand to LIE about his past*??.. And, what would motivate Swami Shantinand to *LIE*?... (Although to his credit Swami Shantinand quit his charade and-, "gave up this nonsense of claiming the title of Shankaracharya".) Herewith are the *lIES* (and the facts you ignore).. a. *legal Fact* the publication of the "will", which surfaced weeks after Sri BrahmanandJi's passing. Inspite of Swami Shantanand's claim-, > > Item #1). A fully executed will of > > Sri BrahmanandJi was deposited in > > Allhalabad on December 18, 1952. > > (1st paragraph page 2 of 'Om Sri Jyothirmath') b. Swami Shantinand was a poor choice because of the *Legal Fact* he could not comprehend sanskrit nor the Vedas. Inspite of Swami Shantinand's claim-, > > He was completely qualified the hold the > > seat as he was literate in > > Sanskrit and the Vedas". > > (2nd paragraph page 2 of 'Om Sri Jyothirmath') c. At issue was the fact that Swami Shantanand was installed in Sri BrahmanandJi's gaddi by "Brahmachari Mahesh and few friends that thought the will could be credible". As, Dana Sawyer Professor of Religion and Philoshpy at Maine College of Art has pointed out. Inspite of Swami Shantinand's claim-, > > Item #2). He was installed in Varansi > > in the presence of hundreds of > > scholars from all over the country > >(2nd paragraph page 3 of 'Om Sri Jyothirmath') d. At issue were the suspicious behavior and motivations of Brahmachari Mahesh at about the time of Sri BrahmanandJi's passing. .."In fact, the earliest doubts about the will left by Brahmananda Saraswati were linked to suspicion of the motives and actions of Mahesh Yogi (then called Mahesh Brahmachari)..." http://www.ucl.ac.uk/~ucgadkw/position/shank-jyot-ascii.html e. From the Kropinski interview of Oct. 1986 with the *ONLY LEGIMATE LEGALLY RECOGNIZED* Shankaracharya of Jyosimutt. ..."He said, word came to me that he (Shantinand) had requested to be allowed on the stage. I allowed him to be present only because he has given up this nonsense of claiming title to Shankaracharya. He said Vishnu Devanand, Mahesh's so-called Shankaracharya, was also here in Vrindaban, he also requested to come onto the stage, but I refused. Then, he (Vishnu Devanand) stated he would sit on a lower, undecorated seat if I allowed him to attend. I refused him. Then, he again begged to simply sit on the floor of the stage at my feet, if I allowed him to be publicly present. Again I refused. He said, if I allow him to be seen with me, and all the while wrongfully claiming title as Shankaracharya, it will appear as if I approve of his activity, and I do not. Therefore, he said, I have ordered that he may not even come into the tent to sit in the audience...." http://minet.org/Documents/shank-1 Another my final question to you Sir LawsonJi-, ..If nearly every statement in Shantinand's book 'Om Sri Jyothirmath" was a *LIE*, and the fact Swami Shantinand eventually gave the nonsense of claiming title of Shankarcharya, was there ever any statement made by Swami Shantinand from June 1953 to 1980 that was true? As, i said.., i have no interest in this matter other than to show you the fallacy of your- "Tired Old Anoop Chandola Story". As it is a fact your pal Anoop Chandola intentionally took advantage of a gullible western. Pranams, Stephen Perino To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
