You might find them interesting. I think due to the nature of the studies and information gained, these areas don't lend themselves to explainations of hypnosis:
Global Consciousness Project Dean Radin, Roger Nelson
Veritas The Afterlife Experiments Gary Schwartz
How Not To Review Mediumship Research Gary Schwartz
The Monroe Institute OBE research (although there are some hypnotic qualities to the hemisync training - The info gained by OBE's can be verified and not explained by hypnosis.
Joseph McMoneagle From his personal bio : I returned to America in late 1977, accepting a commission as a Warrant Officer, as well as an assignment to Headquarters, Intelligence and Security Command. Less than a year later I was recruited as Remote Viewer #001 of the very black and very sensitive Psychic Spy unit now known as STARGATE. As one of the original viewers with that unit, I helped design and build an effective paranormal collection and support unit that serviced nearly all major Intelligence Agencies within the Federal Government for a period exceeding seventeen years.
Lots of stuff here. He's married to Bob Monroe's step-daughter. I heard that the military ran all the prospective remote viewers in the Stargate project thru the Monroe Institute programs...
JohnY
--- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have no problem with the switching language structures. Using the
> language of hyponosis how are things like non locality, remote viewing
> and astral projection explained? They can be tested for and have been.
> Waking state a self hypnosis, ok no problem. Awakening, self
> hypnosis, ok, no problem there either. I'm curious and haven't studied
> the folks you have....
>
>
> JohnY
>
>
> I was not aware that any of those phenomenon had been tested in a
> controlled setting with a professional magician present. I do know
> that no one collected James Randi's $100,000 for demonstrating that
> type of phenomenon. If you have any cool links to share I would like
> to read more. I don't deny that the mind may be capable of this stuff,
> it may well be true. Trance states might facilitate the experience.
> I am interested in reports of a mother's connection to her kids across
> space. I think that might be a good area to start to test ESP phenomenon.
>
> As far as the states reached in hypnotic techniques, I found them
> identical to what I had experienced in TM in my own experience. But I
> know it can be argued that I was just used to transcending. In my
> small group of therapists, who were in the hypnosis training with me,
> I was able to test if other people would have the type of experiences
> that I had through TM and sidhis through hypnosis. They would report
> very similar states of mind. The Chopra technique, which I think is
> also the old Age of Enlightenment technique is a fantastic induction
> and can produce some really interesting experiences in people who have
> never done TM. I also am aware of the criticism that just because the
> experiences sound alike it doesn't mean they are the same experience.
> But since I didn't have my pocket EEG with me I'll never know. I am
> not claiming to have rigorously tested anything. It just changed my
> ideas about the uniqueness of the experiences I had in TM. I'm sure
> I am not alone in this mini revelation! It seems as though many other
> meditators from other systems report similar experiences. TM's
> insistence on uniqueness seems like a marketing ploy. The bigger
> picture is that there are many fascinating states of mind gained
> through all sorts of practices spiritual and otherwise. Understanding
> it all is a long way off for me.
>
>
>
> --- In [email protected], "jyouells2000" jyouells@ wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues"
> > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hey Turq,
> > >
> > > I re-read your post about darshon with Gangaji to make sure I hadn't
> > > missed something. I think your view of darshon is pretty close to how
> > > I thought of it when I was involved in TM. I don't really see what you
> > > wrote as a new way of looking at it. I think many TM people who share
> > > the view that you are awakening to your own nature and the presence of
> > > the teacher is just an exposure to someone who knows themselves in
> > > that way.
> > >
> > > Once you have the assumption in place that you are in the presence
> > > of a person who is using more of their mind then you are, or in a more
> > > awakened state, you have one of the most powerful influences on
> > > suggestibility in place, authority. This effect is well known in
> > > therapy where the recognition of the authority of the therapist is a
> > > factor. In my view it is not just the teacher doing something to
> > > you, like hypnotizing you.. Ericksonian hypnosis invites you to alter
> > > the way you converse with yourself internally. The client enters into
> > > deeper levels of trance through their own power, not from the
> > > hypnotist's power. The hypnotherapist is a facilitator of the person
> > > accessing their own depth of trance state necessary to accomplish the
> > > goal of the session. If you had a room full of people who did not
> > > have the intention to play ball you would get superficial results.
> > > Take a room full of the press in the room with MMY. I don't think any
> > > of the skeptics in the room come away with a profound sense that they
> > > were in the room with a great saint or even a powerful man. But
> > > people with a different mindset to have profound experiences. Your
> > > explanation proposes a mechanics via the concept of the aura to
> > > describe it. I would view it as a predictable result of the language
> > > pattern used, coupled by the subject's willingness to go along with
> > > the process, and a long habit of accessing deep trance states. I
> > > don't mean this to minimize the experience as "just a trance". I am
> > > just using the language of one system in the context of the other.
> > > Switching sides I might phrase it that in the presence of MMY, a
> > > person becomes aware of their own inner unbounded Self and finds it
> > > easy to access their own pure consciousness and their true nature.
> > > But in the system of hypnosis the assumptions contained in that phrase
> > > are dropped.
> > >
> > > I think that both the traditional view of what is going on, and the
> > > information from hypnotherapists is useful in understanding such
> > > phenomenon. There too worlds have been held apart by suspicions on
> > > both sides of the fence. It is also a result of people having
> > > superficial experiences with meditation or the deeper states of
> > > hypnosis. But when you have deep experiences of both, the overlap
> > > becomes much more obvious. These are unusual (for most people) mental
> > > states when they are experienced profoundly, and I think there is a
> > > lot to be learned by combining data. The fact that the formal
> > > language structure used in hypnosis, is also used by many spiritual
> > > teachers has important implications.
> > >
> >
> > I have no problem with the switching language structures. Using the
> > language of hyponosis how are things like non locality, remote viewing
> > and astral projection explained? They can be tested for and have been.
> > Waking state a self hypnosis, ok no problem. Awakening, self
> > hypnosis, ok, no problem there either. I'm curious and haven't studied
> > the folks you have....
> >
> >
> > JohnY
> >
>
__._,_.___
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'
Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___
