Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Dubya ain't the only one getting his instructions fro...

[MDixon6569]

In a message dated 10/26/06 3:24:19 P.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > That may be. However, life and a soul inhabiting the body (whatever THAT > means in a > Buddhist context) may be two different things. > > > > > Yeah yeah , that's the ticket! Good answer Spair! > Is the fertilized human egg a living organism? Does it deserve of all the rights of a child? Why or why not? Based upon my understanding of the Buddhist concept that life begins at conception it is complete with spirit.You would have to ask them why they believe that. If it is, why should they not have the most fundamental right of all innocence, life? Who gets to decide when life starts and when it needs to end? That is a very dangerous position to let anybody have. Better to err on the side of caution than set a precedent that can be arbitrarily moved about.  __._,_.___ To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe __,_._,___