Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: A theory of Karma, TMOers, and the TMO's "Persona"

Fri, 27 Oct 2006 08:26:57 -0700

Yes that is what I learned in 77. 
 The sanskrit part I dont know he had a lot of problems with the public on the mantras so he created another way.  That worked but as you said he saved the other sutra for a later date.  

----- Original Message ----
From: Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 1:05:43 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: A theory of Karma, TMOers, and the TMO's "Persona"


On Oct 27, 2006, at 10:40 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:

--- In FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com, Louis McKenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



He knew what it was supposed to do. He maybe did not know 

that mechanics of how it would go.  



Just a question -- do you (or, for that matter,

does *anyone* here) actually believe that Patanjali's

technique involved thinking "relationship of body and

akasha...lightness of cotton fiber" in ANY language, 

much less English?


It *astounds* me that people still believe that what

Maharishi sold to them is what Patanjali had in mind.


And of course I had posted a while back the comments of Tat Whale Baba's successor who stated that it had to be done in Sanskrit. Levitation actually involves two sutras, not one, and a mastery of a certain form of prana, which is very dangerous without very close personal instruction. Hopping actually is another siddhi, the bhuchari siddhi, the siddhi of hopping like a frog...



__._,_.___

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'



Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

Reply via email to