--- In [email protected], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>  
> In a message dated 11/1/06 6:36:54 P.M. Central Standard Time,  
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> 
> n the  first place, he wasn't "accusing" the troops
> in Vietnam of atrocities,  contrary to the wingnut
> spin. He was *reporting* what they themselves  had
> said they had done. And the point was not to hold
> the troops up to  criticism but the civilian and
> military leadership who were running the  war.
> 
> Kerry has *never* spoken ill of the troops. He's
> their fiercest  defender.
> 
> 
> 
> So Kerry was reporting a bunch of hearsay to  congress?
>

He was repeating testimony. That's not repeating hearsay. If he was using that 
testimony 
to attempt to prove that such things happened, it would be hearsay, but he 
merely 
asserted that he had heard the testimony from those who claimed that they 
themselves 
had committed the acts.

In fact, it is entirely possible that his testimony COULD have been used in a 
trial against 
the people who made the confessions. Hearsay isn't always really hearsay, 
according to the 
law.




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to