On Nov 5, 2006, at 3:06 PM, sparaig wrote:

--- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Turq: "Me, I'm more comfortable with that approach, and that

level of honesty. But others really prefer to believe

that they are pursuing a spiritual path that is based

on some kind of science, and not gods and goddesses

and attracting their benevolent attention. Can't fault

them for that, and for preferring to believe that. But

to think that *Maharishi* believes it is IMO silly."


Me: I agree that TMO would be coming from a more honest place if they

would just let their inner Hindu hang out and stop trying to claim

that it is through the window of science...

That way they could just let people know all the beliefs upfront and

people could make a more informed choice about it all. But I guess

that is a pretty moot point with Google and all.


Interesting stuff about how the Buddhists deal with Westerners. 

Ethnocentrism is found in every culture more or less. Remember the

Japanese with their "we come from Gods, everyone else came from

monkeys" line!  Nice one.





The devas-as-laws-of-nature is standard Hindu. MMY and company take it a little further 

than most, but its standard with new age, theosophy, etc., as well as hindu.



The devas-as-laws-of-nature is pure Hindutva politics and just their version of Creation Science and the Hindu version of "intelligent design". You say IHVH, they say AGNI.
__._,_.___

To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___

Reply via email to