--- In [email protected], Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> On Nov 16, 2006, at 12:03 PM, authfriend wrote:
>
> >> I understand that in your professional life as an editor,
precision
> >> is everything. However, on a forum such as this, most everything
> >> expressed is in kind of rough draft form. Even posts well
thought
> >> out are posted for their exploratory value, rather as definitive
> >> statements.
> >>
> >> Though your zeroing in on language or thought inconsistencies
may
> > be
> >> of some value, you then make those inconsistencies the point of
the
> >> thread, rather than noting them, and moving on to the substance
of
> >> the post.
> >>
> >> This short circuits further discussion, and prevents
> >> the exploration of further ideas. Is that really your
> >> intent here?
> >
> > You mean, the idea that my responses to Mark were
> > like the behavior of a cocaine addict??
>
> It's Marek, to be precise. :)
>
> Sal
>
:-)
