--- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> > wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@> > > wrote: <snip> > > > This short circuits further discussion, and prevents > > > the exploration of further ideas. Is that really your > > > intent here? > > > > You mean, the idea that my responses to Mark were > > like the behavior of a cocaine addict?? > > No, as I said above,
Yes, I know what you said above. I was responding to your question immediately above. Since you were responding to my request that somebody quote Barry's post about cocaine addict behavior, I assumed you were asking me whether I wanted to see that post so I could short-circuit further discussion about it. Misunderstanding, sorry. <snip> > > Heck, no, I'd find further discussion of that idea > > utterly fascinating. > > I found Marek's analysis and responses to you spot on. Er, I don't believe they were comparing me to a cocaine addict, though. > > Is it really your intent that everyone who received > > Barry's complete post be able to discuss this idea, > > while I am allowed to see only that single paragraph > > from it? > > > I didn't see any more of Barry's post than you did. I just read > this forum on the Yahoo Group website. OK. I'll get back to the rest of your post a little later.
