--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], new.morning <no_reply@> > wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "Marek Reavis" <reavismarek@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Judy, don't say no. My promise is genuine. The fact that I don't > > > share your views is no reason to nix the experiment. I'll be > > > scrupulous and thorough even though I can't guarantee that I will > find > > > the same faults and flaws as you would; but that's part of the > > > experiment, right? And we've got nothing to lose by at least > trying. > > > No one will be hurt, no cause lost -- there won't be any bad > > > consequences at all. How can we not at least try? > > > > > > Please. Reconsider. It won't be that hard, I'm positive. Please > > > just think it over a little more. Sleep on it and let me know > > > tomorrow, okay? > > > > > > Marek > > > > > > > And I offer to assist Marek. And Judy, you gotta know by now, I am > far > > from blind to unsubstantiated assertions, character assaults and > poor > > logic emenating from the Turq space. Between the two of us, and more > > people can volunteer, I don't think much will fall through the > cracks. > > (And you can even e-mail us on the side if we go totally retarded > miss > > something.) > > Jeez, guys, be my guest. If you'd been doing it all > along, I wouldn't have had to. >
I know. I was just thinking: this is all judy has been asking for for some time. But its a two way street. We should be able to call you to the same standards applied to Turq. (and others)
