On Nov 17, 2006, at 9:06 AM, new.morning wrote:

--- In [email protected], Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



On Nov 17, 2006, at 8:02 AM, dhamiltony2k5 wrote:





Seems pretty clear they're willing to sanitize *anything*, even
research they claim is scientific.



While the sanitizing is a reflection of humorous victorian
sensibilities, it hardly can be generalized to falsifying research, if
that is you implication. Most acknowledge some research is poor. That
does not make all TM research invalid or unscientific.


It's an organization wide trend. If you want to trust their research, good for you.

Show me the research on all the negative side effects of TM done by the TMO. I'll anxiously await your response.

Reply via email to