--- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Judy:"I think you mean Curtis's (exceptionally dishonest)
> attack on me, don't you? You know, the one in which
> he equated "angry wisdom" with road rage in order to
> demean it, and suggested that my purported anger was
> equally psychologically unbalanced as the anger of
> drivers who attack drivers with their vehicles?"
> 
> Me: There was nothing dishonest in what I wrote.  But here you have
> made a slippery move haven't you?  I was talking about people 
getting
> angry behind the wheel because they feel more powerful in a car. 
Later
> I made a distinction between road rage behaviors and  aggressive
> driving, so I know you are aware that this is not what I said or
> meant.  But it sounded better to turn it into me equating your 
posting
> behavior with "attacking drivers with their vehicles' didn't it?
> 
> Here is the actual post:
> I come across a lot of "angry wisdom" drivers on the Capital 
Beltway.
> They pound on their dashes and point to other drivers as if every
> lane change is a personal attack on them. I have heard that road 
rage
> is a way to feel powerful behind the wheel of a car when the person
> feels powerless in their personal life. Or maybe "angry wisdom"
> people are like a person carrying a hammer, so everything looks 
like a
> nail to pound on. Feeling as if they are the only skilled drivers 
on
> the road and everyone else must be corrected to their "bad 
driving."
> 
> "Angry wisdom", man that is a great phrase!

Hi Curtis, yep, that's why I didn't reply to Judy's response- life 
is too short. I have always found that you write in a clear and 
unequivocal way, and I saw that with your original post about 'angry 
wisdom'/road rage, that it came off to me as witty and fun. 
Nothing 'exceptionally dishonest' about it- where *that* coloring 
came from I don't know...and don't *want* to know...
Whatever you write, the vibe I consistently get is 'here is someone 
enjoying their life...'- Like you mentioned earler, don't sweat the 
small stuff...


Reply via email to