--- In [email protected], Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Nov 17, 2006, at 10:46 AM, sparaig wrote: > > > Neither simple nor complex. > > > > And you keep claiming that shamatha is the same as TM. Here's what > > an apparently > > famous Shamatha advocate says about shamatha. He, at least, has the > > excuse that he > > never learned TM: > <gracious snip> > > No that's NOT what I claim. I merely said TM is a *form* of Shamatha. > That's certainly not to imply that all forms of Shamatha are the same > as TM, they are not. > > There are literally hundreds of different styles of Shamatha. >
Well, so this guy's description of Shamatha certainly doesn't sound like TM. Whose description of Shamatha does?
