Yes, Judy, that was an insulting remark about Sparaig.  And his remark
about you blowing up (psychologically) if deprived of access to this
forum was equally insulting to you.  And your remarks about why Barry
had deleted so many posts the other day was purely gratuitous
speculation and implied that it was some signature of deviousness and
foul play.  Also an insult.

You seem to have successfully personified the "Other".  That is a very
powerful technique to keep your attention off the Self.  Every reason
you can give, every example you can recall, every documentation you
can cite to justify your perpetual war with Barry (as your personal
incarnation of unfairness and dishonesty), is eloquent testimony to
the effectiveness of that program.

As Jim pointed out to Barry, (to paraphrase): "if you see it, (the
fault), then in whose mind is the fault?"  

And a few posts after this one he reminded you of Maharishi's teaching
that "What you put your attention on grows stronger in your life." 
That one teaching is, in my mind, perhaps the greatest single
technique Maharishi ever imparted.

Barry (and some others, too, and equally if not more so) can be, and
is at times, very rude.  And insulting.  Particularly towards you and
Sparaig.  And you believe that he is intellectually dishonest, as well.

Dwell on that for next 10 years and let us know how it works out for you.

**

--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <sparaig@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Maharishi has said of SSRS's techniques, that meditators 
> > > should "Beware of sweet poison." I heard the lecture (THE 
> > > lecture?) on ayurveda that he gave in honor of Triguna 
> > > where he described ayurveda as the process of turning 
> > > poison into nectar. Nectar is NOT "sweet poison." In 
> > > fact, it is worse than normal poison.
> > 
> > Is there anyone here as embarrassed as I am
> > to have ever been part of the spiritual
> > organization that could have created such
> > a mindset in one of its followers?
> 
> Marek, this is the kind of thing I was talking
> about--entirely gratuitous, vicious insults of
> TM supporters.  No need to "stir up the nest,"
> this kind of bee stings compulsively without
> having been provoked.
>



Reply via email to