--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Marek Reavis" <reavismarek@> > wrote: > <snip> > > That's all I was talking about. I wasn't trying to shut you up. > > You asked the question about what Maharishi meant by what you put > > your attention on grows stronger in your life > > No, it was Jim who asked the question of me. I > had a hunch you'd gotten the attributions mixed up. > I even put in attribution lines in brackets to try > to clarify it for you. > > In response, I asked Jim why he wasn't asking > *Barry* that question. That was all I contributed > in that exchange. > > I have a pretty good idea what MMY means by it, > although not experientially, because, as I've > said, that sort of thing has simply never worked > for me. > **
Oh, okay, I got it mixed up. I knew Jim had asked you if you were familiar with the phrase, and I knew that you had asked him why he hadn't asked Barry that question, but I thought you had tossed in the last query about what Maharishi meant by it. I guess that was Jim's, too. No harm. But you are incorrect in stating that it doesn't work for you; it works demonstrably fine. The motor is on and running; reverse or forward are just the just the directions. That's the driver's decision. Good luck and enjoy. Marek
