--- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> 
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@> 
> > wrote:
> > <snip>
> > > Are you familiar with Maharishi's expression, "Whatever you
> > > put your attention on, grows"? What do you suppose he means
> > > by that?
> > 
> > 
> > "The thing that was really wearing me down about this autocratic 
> rule
> > was the unrelenting toxic spew coming from the likes of Limbaugh,
> > Hannity, O'Reilly, Coulture and Graham."--Jim Flanegin
> > 
> > 
> > "I tried to track it many years ago, but have just been 
overwhelmed
> > by the extent of Bush's staggering ineptitude! It really IS 
> stranger
> > than fiction..."--Jim Flanegin
> > 
> > 
> > "Yes, my outlook towards Cheney/Bush continues to be cynical, 
> because
> > they constantly and unabashedly lie to those they govern. That in
> > conjunction with their utter ineptitude and disregard for
> > consequences makes them the last people I would entrust to 
> establish
> > a democracy in Iraq."--Jim Flanegin
> > 
> > 
> > (examples from just this past month)
> >
> These are all things *I* wrote. I know what Maharishi's statement 
> means to *me*. I was asking what it meant to *you*.

Theoretically, it would mean, in the case of
politics, putting my attention on the potential
of the Democrats rather than the incompetence
of the Republicans.

Experientially, it means nothing at all to me.

So how do you square it with your frequent
fulminations about the Republicans?  Seems to
me the attention that's been put on their sins
has had the effect of diminishing them, rather
than making them grow.



Reply via email to